Posts categorized “scholarly communications”

Instructional guide for scientific data management

Here is an instructional guide I developed for scientific data management:

Directed at Berkeley graduate students and researchers, this guide divides data management into six activities and explains best practices for each one. The guide includes short videos, links, and tips that can be used independently or as part of a larger data management literacy program.

This guide complements the page on “Preparing Data Management Plans for NSF Grant applications.”





Sharing high-quality and well-organized scientific data and information

Here is my guest lecture for LBSC 670 Organization of Information at the College of Information Studies, University of Maryland.





Berlin 9 Open Access Conference poster

Advancing the impact of research: The Berkeley Research Impact Initiative (BRII)





Sharing academic and professional information through social media

This was a guest lecture and discussion for LIB 100 Information Literacy, an undergraduate class at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, NC.

It was conducted as a live web conference and was 50 minutes long. The students were together in a classroom in North Carolina and I web conferenced in from California.

Here is the presentation transcript. (Download PDF copy)

Here is the presentation handout. (Download PDF copy)





Research information sharing and information synthesis

This was a guest lecture and discussion for LIB 100 Information Literacy, an undergraduate class at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, NC.

It was conducted as a live web conference and was 50 minutes long. The students were together in a classroom in North Carolina and I web conferenced in from California.

Here is the presentation transcript. (Download PDF copy)

Here is the presentation handout. (Download PDF copy)





Video highlights of hearing on public access to federally-funded research

Serving as video editor, I assisted Margaret Phillips in assembling this video of highlights from the Congressional hearing entitled “Public Access to Federally-Funded Research” on July 29, 2010, with the Information Policy, Census, and National Archives Subcommittee.

This video was prepared for UC Berkeley Library’s Open Access Week 2010.





Draft survey to evaluate UC Libraries Springer Pilot Agreement for open access publishing

PURPOSE: To draft survey questions for an evaluation of the UC Libraries Springer Pilot agreement for open access publishing.

TYPE: Questionnaire

AUDIENCE: Springer Journal Open Access Pilot Task Force, University of California

METHODS: Drafted a questionnaire based on the findings from a literature review

RESULTS: The draft survey is currently being reviewed.





Identifying questions to ask for a survey on open access perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors

TYPE: Report

AUDIENCE: Springer Journal Open Access Pilot Task Force, University of California

PURPOSE: To identify potential survey questions and research findings to test for an evaluation of the UC Libraries Springer Pilot agreement for open access publishing.

METHODS: Reviewed 8 studies that examined scholarly communication or evaluated open access publishing.

RESULTS:

  • A concept map illustrating a framework for evaluating open access (Full text PDF)
  • A spreadsheet identifying pertinent research findings for testing and surveying (Full text PDF)

PREVIEW:





Open access publishing does not conflict with LBNL publication requirements

peace dove

PURPOSE: To respond to the LBNL Library Committee’s question: Does open access publishing conflict with LBNL publication requirements for patents, copyright, and public access?

AUDIENCE: LBNL Library Committee

METHOD: Discussed this question with (1) an attorney at Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Management Department and (2) the Report Coordination Office at LBNL.

REPORT: In response, a report was collaboratively written with Rosemary Lowden and Jean Wolslegel. (Full text PDF available upon request. Email jlloo at lbl dot gov)

HAIKU SUMMARY OF REPORT:

    O. A. and patents,
    copyright, public access?
    No conflict, same rules.




On promoting open access at LBNL

TYPE: Presentation

AUDIENCE: LBNL Library Committee

PURPOSE: To foster discussion about the awareness of open access principles, the options for open access, and the opportunities for promoting open access at LBNL.

INTENDED OUTCOME: To consider the need for open access promotion.

FORMAT: 20 minute presentation and 15 minute discussion.

TRANSCRIPT: Full text PDF

SLIDES: